tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post200510715986963779..comments2023-11-25T11:00:42.257+01:00Comments on Invisible to the eye: Why I'm leaving Subversion for GitGiorgiohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03558287012747987157noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-46065185817371237352010-03-05T14:51:26.891+01:002010-03-05T14:51:26.891+01:00I tried Git, and ran screaming away. Biggest pain ...I tried Git, and ran screaming away. Biggest pain is merging changes from various developers and Git makes it even way more complicated then SVN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-33832311790421277072010-03-05T08:40:23.841+01:002010-03-05T08:40:23.841+01:00I knew that you'll like git, as I did ;) IMHO ...I knew that you'll like git, as I did ;) IMHO git is so natural for Linux user, not mention how handy it is (i.e. versioning /etc directory).Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575525740024165599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-62227612230581723432010-03-05T08:24:21.771+01:002010-03-05T08:24:21.771+01:00In what sense? Writing is not the slow part, commi...In what sense? Writing is not the slow part, committing is. :)Giorgiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12689416577856305650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-82655593489964551792010-03-05T07:32:51.890+01:002010-03-05T07:32:51.890+01:00The more articles like this I read about git and h...The more articles like this I read about git and hg, I am more provoked to move away from svn. <br /><br />Subversion has been working well for us. Sometimes, I ask myself, do you even write code without connecting to the Internet?Sudheerhttp://techchorus.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-43820554476616567482010-03-05T01:46:18.452+01:002010-03-05T01:46:18.452+01:00mercurial is really nice and usable - you should g...mercurial is really nice and usable - you should give it a try...<br /><br />anyway, good step moving away from that painful svnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-11654172667038885952010-03-04T20:38:48.563+01:002010-03-04T20:38:48.563+01:00I have not tried Mercurial but Fowler says it and ...I have not tried Mercurial but Fowler says it and Git are the only one quality DVCS.<br />@Bogdan: do you mean using svnadmin and file:///? You' re right that this can substitute the usage of a server. Though, it's not the same than using Git, I wouldn't know how to merge a local repository into a remote one. :)Giorgiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12689416577856305650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-13887383264561253002010-03-04T18:05:05.476+01:002010-03-04T18:05:05.476+01:00I have to disagree with you on the local repositor...I have to disagree with you on the local repository issue.<br /> <br />I've been using local SVN repositories for some time now, with no problems.Bogdanhttp://www.gridpulse.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36547168.post-72415753449775032822010-03-04T16:44:25.526+01:002010-03-04T16:44:25.526+01:00I did switch from SVN to Mercurial not so long ago...I did switch from SVN to Mercurial not so long ago, and oh boy it was so eye opening. Anyway, every distributed SCM is a great peace of software, name it Git, Mercurial, Bazaar. The choice between them is a matter of your needs and workflows.<br />If anyone is interested in Mercurial, see http://hginit.com/.e.s.tnoreply@blogger.com